From owner-freebsd-atm Thu Apr 5 1:13:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from aspenworks.com (aspenworks.com [192.94.236.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC1E37B424 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 01:13:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alex@aspenworks.com) Received: from d7k (matrix.aspenworks.com [216.38.199.82]) by aspenworks.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id CAA20661; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 02:13:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from alex@aspenworks.com) Message-ID: <013401c0bda8$28967bc0$1800a8c0@d7k> From: "Alex Huppenthal" To: "Harti Brandt" Cc: "Richard Hodges" , References: Subject: Re: ATM 4.3 and so on Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 02:12:27 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Sounds intriging. What *is* the new netgraph version of ATM? :-) Can I use it soon? (oh please oh please :-) Thei tiny frag problem has halted my progress with rural internet access. -Alex ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harti Brandt" To: "Alex Huppenthal" Cc: "Richard Hodges" ; Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 2:09 AM Subject: Re: ATM 4.3 and so on > On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Alex Huppenthal wrote: > > AH>is ATM supported in 4.3 ? Is anyone else seeing 'tiny fragment' errors? > AH>Lucent/Xedia routers won't pass the traffic from 4.2 OS + ATM and cite 'tiny > AH>fragment' attack, as the reason. > > Don't know about 4.3. Last time I tried HARP didn't compile under CURRENT > because of the new bus_*. (But I have the new netgraph ATM almost > running). > > harti > -- > harti brandt, http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private > brandt@fokus.gmd.de, harti@begemot.org > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message