From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 10 05:51:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56E3106564A for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Yoshio.Uomori@jp.yokogawa.com) Received: from zns001-0m9003.yokogawa.co.jp (zns001-0m9003.yokogawa.co.jp [203.174.79.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E428FC0A for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zns001-0m9003.yokogawa.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zns001-0m9003.yokogawa.co.jp (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id o2A5puaB014750 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:51:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from zex001-0m9026.jp.ykgw.net (zex001-0m9026.p.ykgw.net [10.0.11.15] (may be forged)) by zns001-0m9003.yokogawa.co.jp (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id o2A5puSB014747 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:51:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from EXMAIL03.jp.ykgw.net ([10.0.11.29]) by zex001-0m9026.jp.ykgw.net ([10.0.11.15]) with mapi; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:51:56 +0900 From: To: Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:51:55 +0900 Thread-Topic: Question about a trademark license agreement with Sun Thread-Index: AcrAFcpO10xJ8E2ITOCerTcvMQa93w== Message-ID: <7C47087445391A4C9A0C437A8A9CA538D33F5E4A2B@EXMAIL03.jp.ykgw.net> Accept-Language: ja-JP Content-Language: ja-JP X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: ja-JP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:42:43 +0000 Subject: Question about a trademark license agreement with Sun X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:51:58 -0000 > Hello, > > I have a question about a trademark license agreement with Sun of diablo-= jre1.6. > > In my case, is a this license necessary? > And, please teach me about my operation. > > > =20 > Why not use OpenJDK instead? It's also more up to date and better=20 > supported, as it doesn't seem like the FreeBSD foundation is doing any=20 > more Java work. I did not know OpenJDK. I can not use diablo-jre1.6?=