From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 13:59:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3776E106568E for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:59:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shteryana@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f224.google.com (mail-fx0-f224.google.com [209.85.220.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913968FC08 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so3124102fxm.3 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:59:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SvuYQDDzqSv2b5uk3pLXUfGkGMYXAweJBhsUT7jaBDM=; b=buMjHTC2VApGuI+gcPAsKRj5dFN0l0r+oPEVRshgXGK+2am/Bcob/xabNFSNo3+S0F uEzkC9eN1Ya/Ec2r+cj+U3HIRZgi6GtGUDDzxb2lOJjqocZ6COWpoF9AM31ZrgLUeeN6 4vmTP2HV39uK4wJg+DloS+froKray+iqAZI+c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=XCQO/5dhAu/ykuOPYlL7LARoguzCQfg+QrVfnGDCSoDUsA9Oi+Od6ttc+CguiiYb+f L7EDIIz/QM1WGIMJsvWmTu1lsqjGKXOTfFh+2SakA7C8uwPqhhJj+pQXY5IJ2EDzl/55 e9z9SP/9BQHO4NsNGKhWpjvraXawAXA8CsXWM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.77.91 with SMTP id f27mr1199247fak.60.1269525570623; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:59:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BAB5A77.7050505@mts.com.ua> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:59:30 +0000 Message-ID: <61b573981003250659n1076fef1u7d15920c4d560fdf@mail.gmail.com> From: Shteryana Shopova To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:59:32 -0000 Hi all, On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Vasyl Samoilov wrote: > > > - bsnmp is lacking developers (I'm the only one). I had a surgery in + 1 (count me in that is) > november and took the 4 weeks after this to rewrite all the networking > stuff. It is in principle mostly up to date and supports also IPv6. The > problem is that I run out of time again and just cannot do the last steps > to release it (including testing). If there were people interested in it, > I would happily work with them. > > harti > sorry to hear about the surgery - I've recently resumed somewhat active work on bsnmp and modules, so if you can upload your work to an accessible repository, say svn.freebsd.org/user/harti I can take on testing and preparing the code for import. btw, I was contacted some time ago by Carlos Santos suggesting a set of patches adding IPV6 transport, unfortunatelly he hasn't replied to any of my last e-mails, is this the same patchset we're talking about or a different one? On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 03/25/10 13:43, Vasyl Samoilov wrote: >> to monitor and query my boxes with snmp - it didn't end well. Any help >> would be appreciated. > > This looks like a good suggestion for a student of Google Summer of Code. > Maybe you can find such a student or advertise the idea on mailing lists > (you'll need to exactly specify what is needed). > We already have BSNMP listed on the SoC project ideas page :) The problem is we still need a developer to review and test the code before it can be imported. :) cheers, Shteryana P.S. Back to the thread topic - so the only problem the author is facing with bsnmp is that it lacks support for LLDP, do I understand correctly?