Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:02:11 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, mike@karels.net, Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>, arch@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: The strangeness called `sbin' Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1111141459490.28029@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=8%2BnbuSsvnFpXi9BdMwqdZzXJEjW0Fjb8CG4WmAu_9rQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201111140101.pAE11XEa067064@mail.karels.net> <201111140802.13355.jhb@freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1111141745001.94325@fledge.watson.org> <20111114193434.GC2164@hoeg.nl> <CAJ-Vmo=8%2BnbuSsvnFpXi9BdMwqdZzXJEjW0Fjb8CG4WmAu_9rQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I honestly think we have _much bigger_ things to try and fix before we > worry about the layout of binaries in the directory hierarchy. > > Once we've sorted out things like virtualisation hooks for the > installer and management, better package management and upgrade paths, > module/kernel build sync, cross-compiled ports, non-root installation > methods, etc, etc.. I think then we could look at this kind of thing. +1 And also how to stop double posts to the same list (freebsd-arch@ removed). -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.1111141459490.28029>