From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 21 17:20:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA7F16A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:20:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F99843D1F for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:20:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru (8.13.0/vak/3.0) id j2LHHgZS033901 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org.checked; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:17:42 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from [144.206.181.94] (hi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.94]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru (8.13.0/vak/3.0) with ESMTP id j2LHHG26033894; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:17:16 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <423F017F.6040305@cronyx.ru> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:16:47 +0300 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John References: <20050320202510.GA29248@mail.unixjunkie.com> <423DEE77.5000704@cronyx.ru> <20050321055451.GB30324@mail.unixjunkie.com> In-Reply-To: <20050321055451.GB30324@mail.unixjunkie.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sangoma T1 drivers. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:20:44 -0000 John wrote: [...] This part is answered. >>>... maybe even part of 5.4? ... :) >>> >>> >>I doubt ;-) >> >> >Its a worthy goal, full of much coolness :). > > This code is new to the FreeBSD tree. Tree in codefreeze stage. And release is coming soon. More over original driver layout differ from acceptable one (as I understand from discussion). I doubt that any one would risk to fix and bring third party code to the system in a hurry. Only if the commiter who will bring code to the system is using it for RealJob (tm) and sure that it is very stable. Add to this the speed of delivery of device sample to that commiter. Commitng of untested code even to Current is very very bad practice. That is why I doubt. rik >>rik >> >> >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >