Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 06:54:04 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@acm.org> To: Andrius =?utf-8?B?TW9ya8WrbmFz?= <hinokind@gmail.com> Cc: yuri@rawbw.com, =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=2E_Bergstr=F6m?= <cbergstrom@pathscale.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GSoC: Making ports work with clang Message-ID: <20100503205404.GA52895@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <op.vb4s9tlx43o42p@klevas> References: <op.vb0w1zrh43o42p@klevas> <4BDD28E2.8010201@rawbw.com> <op.vb3iwpzw43o42p@klevas> <20100503092213.GA1294@straylight.m.ringlet.net> <4BDEA78F.90303@pathscale.com> <op.vb4pjhux43o42p@klevas> <4BDEC2E3.2030305@pathscale.com> <op.vb4s9tlx43o42p@klevas>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 2010-May-03 16:33:19 +0300, Andrius Morkūnas <hinokind@gmail.com> wrote: >I wasn't talking about any specific port. What I meant is that new hardware >won't stop coming out just because FreeBSD decided not to update their gcc. >New CPUs may have new instructions and other things that are different from >their predecessors in one way or another. As an example of an increasingly common CPU that gcc 4.2 doen't support, consider the Intel Atom. It supports the 'Core' (ie up to SSSE3) instructions but only does in-order execution (like the Pentium 1). -- Peter Jeremy [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkvfN+wACgkQ/opHv/APuIfLRACfWpX5rqzK6X751XG8M4JWtlcr 5MQAnjAruI30pFO7l0U1mnOhKxZawB3j =PT3+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100503205404.GA52895>