From owner-freebsd-current Tue Nov 25 17:45:22 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA29220 for current-outgoing; Tue, 25 Nov 1997 17:45:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA29211 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 1997 17:45:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA15787; Tue, 25 Nov 1997 17:44:37 -0800 (PST) To: TLiddelow@cybec.com.au (Tim Liddelow) cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Fwd: 128+ megs of ram ?] In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 26 Nov 1997 10:32:49 +1100." <347B6021.55A029BA@cybec.com.au> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 17:44:37 -0800 Message-ID: <15784.880508677@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Matthias Scheler wrote: > > > > In article <19971125150250.46858@wins.uva.nl>, > > Frank van der Linden writes: > > > ... and the bootcode should now detect memory amounts 64Mb correctly. > > > > It does. > > NetBSD boot code now detects memory over 64Mb ok..is there any > plan to put this into FreeBSD (current or stable) ? It's been in -current and -stable for weeks. I think we were the first among the *BSDs to do this, in fact. :) Jordan