From owner-freebsd-current Sun Dec 19 20:50: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from green.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9192E1506E; Sun, 19 Dec 1999 20:49:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA01494; Sun, 19 Dec 1999 23:45:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 23:45:08 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman X-Sender: green@green.dyndns.org To: Martin Cracauer Cc: "David O'Brien" , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sh(1) broken caching [was: Re: Broken sh(1)?] In-Reply-To: <19991217123306.A3177@cons.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > I still think we should *seriously* consider switching to pdksh. > > As I said before, pdksh has other bugs. > Also we would loose all the PRs we received in the past. This testing > effort by our user base is a valuable resource. From the tests I ran > on all available shells, only bash2 is considerably better than the > other shells, pdksh has other bugs than our ash, not less. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahahahahaha *cough, HACK, wheeze*. Ahem. Heh, bash2 considerably better. *continues ROFL* > > Martin > -- > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ > Tel.: (private) +4940 5221829 Fax.: (private) +4940 5228536 > -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message