From owner-freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 26 02:48:40 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DA3106566B;
	Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:48:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8938FC15;
	Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:48:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o0Q2fJ7r061568;
	Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:41:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:42:07 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20100125.194207.1000278277145525469.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: rrs@lakerest.net
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100125.191959.956847443352467531.imp@bsdimp.com>
References: <489828.45501.qm@web34403.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<74D48EE5-544E-44D4-9644-2349E9AA9796@lakerest.net>
	<20100125.191959.956847443352467531.imp@bsdimp.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: attilio@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: AR71XX RTC
X-BeenThere: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to MIPS <freebsd-mips.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mips>,
	<mailto:freebsd-mips-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mips>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-mips@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-mips-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mips>,
	<mailto:freebsd-mips-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:48:40 -0000

In message: <20100125.191959.956847443352467531.imp@bsdimp.com>
            "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
: In message: <74D48EE5-544E-44D4-9644-2349E9AA9796@lakerest.net>
:             Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net> writes:
: : Thanks that makes a LOT of sense.. So basically the
: : mtx passed is NOT what is currently in td_lock and we
: : want it updated as we switch.
: 
: Yes.
: 
: I think there still might be a bit of oddness here and there, since
: the cavium port has a weird access to sysctl issue when a rm_lock is
: involved.  I'm not at all sure why that would be...  It may be
: scheduling related, but it may also just be some minor init the cavium
: is doing that's just a bit off...

Looks like the oddness was due to problems in octeon init code...
We're past that now...

Warner