From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  7 18:58:50 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FABB1065675;
	Thu,  7 Jun 2012 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net)
Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net
	[66.230.99.27])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F408FC17;
	Thu,  7 Jun 2012 18:58:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30])
	by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25027E877;
	Thu,  7 Jun 2012 10:58:46 -0800 (AKDT)
Message-ID: <4FD0F9E3.1030501@acsalaska.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:58:43 +0200
From: Mel Flynn <rflynn@acsalaska.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
	rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org>
References: <4FC96D45.8080904@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FC96D45.8080904@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ruby@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9 as default
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 18:58:50 -0000

On 2-6-2012 3:32, Steve Wills wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I think we should try to make Ruby 1.9 the default Ruby again and would
> like to see it done before 9.1 is released. I've submitted a patch which
> does this and requested and exp-run from portmgr.

This may become obsolete soon, since graphics/gdal is going to be
updated, but with my current (slightly outdated) ports tree it fails
with not being able to find:
a) the ruby binary since there is no /usr/local/bin/ruby
b) as a side-effect ruby.h, but also because swig is using a deprecated
Config interface that apparently is unable to set the include path
correctly.

swig-1.3.40
RUBY_VER=1.9 in /etc/make.conf
RUBY config option set in graphics/gdal

Given issues described with swig 1.x earlier on this list, you may want
to investigate if swig 1.x should be removed/patched/whatever before
this sweep.
-- 
Mel