From owner-freebsd-net Sat Jan 18 13: 8:24 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F52037B401; Sat, 18 Jan 2003 13:08:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0615143F13; Sat, 18 Jan 2003 13:08:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 65440AE2DD; Sat, 18 Jan 2003 13:08:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 13:08:14 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/44361: possible raw socket bug Message-ID: <20030118210814.GY33821@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org It appears that we expect the ip_len and ip_off feilds to be sent in host byte order as the stack will fix it to network byte order in ip_output. Is this a bug or feature? :) -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message