From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 5 03:38:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4AF16A41F for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 03:38:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mv@roq.com) Received: from p4.roq.com (ns1.ecoms.com [207.44.130.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F3743D49 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 03:38:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mv@roq.com) Received: from p4.roq.com (localhost.roq.com [127.0.0.1]) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95154CC1A; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 03:38:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ppp157-158.static.internode.on.net [150.101.157.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5274CC2A; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 03:38:07 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <43BC949A.2020405@roq.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 14:38:02 +1100 From: Michael Vince User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Otterholm References: <43BA71F6.2080305@ide.resurscentrum.se> In-Reply-To: <43BA71F6.2080305@ide.resurscentrum.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Router + ADM64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 03:38:05 -0000 Jon Otterholm wrote: > Hi! > > What is there to gain in performance choosing AMD64 on a Dell PE1850 > (Xeon EMT64) when used as router? > > /Jon I have one running under Amd64 FreeBSD. When polling is enabled I do get transfer speeds of up to 112megabytes/sec, the only real down side as far as I am concerned is missing out on VPN capability, which is broken on the AMD64 arch for unknown reasons, I can only hope I won't need it. Mike