From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 9 16:51:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C070F16A4CE; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 16:51:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srv01.sparkit.no (srv01.sparkit.no [193.69.116.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B45843D49; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 16:51:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eivind@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ws.nada ([193.69.114.88]) by srv01.sparkit.no (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i99Gp22W051361; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 18:51:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from eivind@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ws.nada (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ws.nada (8.12.9/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i99GkeEt001868; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 16:46:40 GMT (envelope-from eivind@ws.nada) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by ws.nada (8.12.9/8.12.10/Submit) id i99GkeDH001867; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 16:46:40 GMT (envelope-from eivind) Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 16:46:39 +0000 From: Eivind Eklund To: Brian Somers Message-ID: <20041009164639.GA1737@FreeBSD.org> References: <200410071355.i97DtSJq024575@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041009011553.01708de1@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041009011553.01708de1@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: Mike Makonnen cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What we keep under /etc (was: cvs commit: src/etc rc rc.shutdown src/etc/rc.d ...) X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 16:51:21 -0000 On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 01:15:53AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: > This makes life painful enough to ask.... > > Is there any good reason that mergemaster deals with this stuff rather than > make installworld? Or maybe I should ask, why doesn't make installworld > handle *some* stuff in /etc, such as /etc/rc.d/ and /etc/defaults/? In my opinion, this is a result *only* of mergemaster being broken. A two-way merge has significant problems for anything with two-directional modifications. Modifying our install policy because mergemaster is broken is in my opinion inappropriate. I tried to fix mergemaster, but over a couple of years Doug never found time to look over and accept or reject my patches, so I gave up bugging him about it and wrote a replacement. That replacement is available in /usr/ports/sysutils/etcmerge. etcmerge does not suffer from the problems of mergemaster, and I'd be unhappy to see its users suffer because of deficiencies in mergemaster. Eivind.