From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun 24 12:37:16 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC871065674;
	Sun, 24 Jun 2012 12:37:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kozlov@ravenloft.kiev.ua)
Received: from ravenloft.kiev.ua (ravenloft.kiev.ua [94.244.131.95])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27C18FC0A;
	Sun, 24 Jun 2012 12:37:15 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:37:14 +0300
From: Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20120624123714.GA83824@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
References: <4FE6F010.80609@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4FE6F010.80609@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: X11BASE still in use in ports
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 12:37:16 -0000

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 03:46:40AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> I noticed a failure in one of my ports today while doing an upgrade, and
> was embarrassed to find that it was due to my port still using X11BASE.
> That led me to do a quick grep of the tree, which seems to indicate that
> there are a non-zero number of uses of it which seem to be erroneous:
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/x11base-ports.txt
> 
> Note, some of these are actually Ok, I haven't made an attempt to filter
> them out yet.
> 
> Is there any interest in cleaning these up? Should we restore the
> definition of X11BASE until all of the ports that are using it are fixed?
> 
> I'm kind of surprised by this problem, since the usual way of removing
> something like this is to make sure all of the consumers have been fixed
> first.
I have done a basic analysis. Ports that need to be fixed ('?' - not sure,
'<D>' - should be deleted):  http://people.freebsd.org/~ak/x11base.log


-- 
Alex