From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 3 23:49:58 2001 From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 3 23:49:55 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from VL-MS-MR002.sc1.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F7237B400 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 23:49:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from jehovah ([24.202.203.37]) by VL-MS-MR002.sc1.videotron.ca (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id G6MOF600.GAC; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 02:49:54 -0500 Message-ID: <003b01c07623$182dedd0$25cbca18@jehovah> From: "Bosko Milekic" To: "Alfred Perlstein" Cc: References: <20010103234151.R292@fw.wintelcom.net> Subject: Re: (forw) Two NICs In FreeBSD Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 02:51:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I would go with (a) unless someone is religiously obsessed with having the message stay. Else go with (b) but see if you can fit it in with some "generic verbosity" sysctl knob, as opposed to creating its own. Later, Bosko. > /kernel: arp: 1.2.3.4 is on dc0 but got reply from 00:00:c5:79:d0:0c on dc1 > > Hi can we axe this message already? I see the possibility of using > two 100mbit cards on a switch with a gig uplink to be reason enough > to either axe it, or make it a sysctl to quiet the warnings. > > I've also had this broken config setup as a temporary thing and > my console getting flooded was also quite irritating. > > Anyone going to raise a rukus if I turn it > a) off > b) sysctl default off > c) sysctl default on > > thanks, > -Alfred > > ----- Forwarded message from Tim Gustafson ----- > > From: Tim Gustafson > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Two NICs In FreeBSD > Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 23:37:06 -0500 > Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010103233521.00a58890@esther.falconsoft.com> > X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 > Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > Hello > > I just installed two NIC cards into my FreeBSD machine that are on the same > LAN, each with a different IP. However, I keep getting this sort of > message in my syslog: > > /kernel: arp: 1.2.3.4 is on dc0 but got reply from 00:00:c5:79:d0:0c on dc1 > > I realize that the message is because it's getting two ARP replies, but > this is normal (for this network, anyhow). How can I suppress these > messages from appearing in the syslog? Is it OK to have both interfaces > receiving ARP replies? Will this mess anything up? > > Tim > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Tim Gustafson tim@falconsoft.com > www.falconsoft.com (631)475-6662 > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Share your knowledge - it's a way to achieve immortality. > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -- > -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] > "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message