From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 3 22:27:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E0716A4CE; Sat, 3 Apr 2004 22:27:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lovett.com (core.lovett.com [216.168.8.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5360043D1D; Sat, 3 Apr 2004 22:27:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ade@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ts46-02-qdr1249.mdfrd.or.charter.com ([66.169.242.225] helo=gorf.lovett.com) by mail.lovett.com with asmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1BA16k-000476-5M; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 06:27:50 +0000 Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 22:27:49 -0800 From: Ade Lovett To: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <20040403222749.42837e34@gorf.lovett.com> In-Reply-To: <20040404033602.GA29488@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040404023418.GA37816@crodrigues.org> <20040404025156.GA29009@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040404030247.GA38436@crodrigues.org> <20040404033602.GA29488@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: core@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Problems with USE_AUTOMAKE_VER variable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 06:27:50 -0000 On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 19:36:02 -0800 Kris Kennaway wrote: > The USE_AUTOCONF_VER and related knobs appear to not yet be functional > (in all cases?). Revert the changes made in r1.33 of the makefile and > stick to the WANT_ version for now. I'm pretty sure I'd reverted all the WANT->USE changes, which were the cause of the problems (as opposed to the USE->USE_*_VER). I'm currently stuck in a holding pattern, first awaiting the effective null-commit of bsd.autotools.mk, followed by a second major update to bsd.autotools.mk itself. The PR has been assigned to portmgr for quite some time, yet little appears to be happening on this front. Given the power of (at least) the i386 cluster to do a 4-exp build, why is it taking so long to get this in? If we (collectively) are to clean up the huge mess that is the current autotools layout, then we (collectively) need to be more proactive in getting the changes actually tested. If the resources are not available, for whatever reason, to do this, and, with any heavy-duty infrastructural change, there are bound to be foul-ups, then further development of the system is going to prove to be increasingly difficult, to the point at which those that (a) have the knowledge and (probably more importantly) (b) are willing to take the heat for changes, then we're dead in the water. Now, we can either sit here and bandy around chastisements, or we can get things done. Which is it to be? [cc'd both portmgr and core, since I believe there are more fundamental issues that need to be addressed here than just the matter at hand] -aDe