From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 2 00:48:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA06528 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 00:48:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from firewall.ftf.dk (root@mail.ftf.dk [129.142.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA06481 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 00:48:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk) Received: from mail.prosa.dk ([192.168.100.2]) by firewall.ftf.dk (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA10738; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 11:37:38 +0100 Received: from deepo.prosa.dk (deepo.prosa.dk [192.168.100.10]) by mail.prosa.dk (8.8.5/8.8.5/prosa-1.1) with ESMTP id JAA24892; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 09:56:45 +0100 (CET) Received: (from regnauld@localhost) by deepo.prosa.dk (8.8.7/8.8.5/prosa-1.1) id JAA29850; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 09:47:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <19980302094714.18899@deepo.prosa.dk> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 09:47:14 +0100 From: Philippe Regnauld To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports for X11 stuff References: <34FA5E08.611585A4@san.rr.com> <353.888824865@time.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: <353.888824865@time.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Sun, Mar 01, 1998 at 11:47:45PM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.5-RELEASE i386 Organization: PROSA Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan K. Hubbard writes: > > Actually, this would be far from consistent - it would confuse the > piss out of folks who've become more than used to /usr/X11R6 as the > location for X libraries and binaries over the last 3 years. Changing > it at this juncture would only be a recipe for complete and utter > chaos. Agreed. Just a comment: /usr/X11R6 is a growing beastie. All X related things (app-defaults, libs, binaries, headers) get installed in it. Consequence: /usr/X11R6 easily grows above 100 Mbytes, and this is incompatible with the notion of a static, ro /usr. It's a problem during installation if you're going to unpack X: - either you make /usr 200 Mb or so (knowing you'll be doing dump+restore sooner than you'd want), - or you make it the 90 Mbytes it's happy with, and go to the emergency shell and _remember_ to make /usr/local/X11R6 and symlink. Am I alone ? "Now it'd be nice if"© a simple dialog box popped up during sysinstall saying, "hey, you chose to install X, you have less than N megabytes for /usr, but you have 3 Terabytes in /usr/local: [do you want to | you should ] create /usr/local/X11R6, and make a symlink in /usr ?" I might (*shudder*) even look at sysinstall's code (*tremble*) and see if I can do it myself, if there's interest. -- -[ Philippe Regnauld / sysadmin / regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk / +55.4N +11.3E ]- «Pluto placed his bad dog at the entrance of Hades to keep the dead IN and the living OUT! The archetypical corporate firewall?» - S. Kelly Bootle, ("MYTHOLOGY", in Marutukku distrib) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message