From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Oct 5 11:44:34 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA01011 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 5 Oct 1998 11:44:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from yonge.cs.toronto.edu (yonge.cs.toronto.edu [128.100.2.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA00972 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 1998 11:44:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dholland@cs.toronto.edu) Received: from qew.cs.toronto.edu ([128.100.2.15]) by yonge.cs.toronto.edu with SMTP id <86515-11980>; Mon, 5 Oct 1998 14:43:47 -0400 Received: by qew.cs.toronto.edu id <37768-22953>; Mon, 5 Oct 1998 14:43:13 -0400 Subject: Re: Xlib only (not Xt) X-ware? From: David Holland To: kline@thought.org (Gary Kline) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 14:43:06 -0400 Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <19981003123110.49111@thought.org> from "Gary Kline" at Oct 3, 98 03:31:10 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <98Oct5.144313edt.37768-22953@qew.cs.toronto.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Anybody know of any X-ware ports other than rxvt and xcoral > that do _not_ use the Xt intrinsics, but only Xlib? > > I gave up on my Xlib-only version of an application that I > began in 1996 because my app grew too complex. The Xt route > is simpler in some respects and a whole 'nother ballgame in > others. If there are any other (significant) efforts done > in Xlib-only I'd like to know. I have a project underway that's Xlib-only, because I found it to be cleaner and simpler than using Xt. On the other hand, it's not likely to show up in the ports collection for months, if ever. -- - David A. Holland | (please continue to send non-list mail to dholland@cs.utoronto.ca | dholland@hcs.harvard.edu. yes, I moved.) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message