From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 22 14:01:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB19916A4B3; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-56339.0x50c6aa0a.abnxx2.customer.tele.dk [80.198.170.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2955643FB1; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:01:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9ML18iO040443; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:01:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id h9ML18Gi040442; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:01:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos) From: Soren Schmidt Message-Id: <200310222101.h9ML18Gi040442@spider.deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: <20031022225649.619ab572.Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Alexander Leidinger Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:01:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.3 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: John Baldwin Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata ata-dma.c ata-pci.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:01:28 -0000 It seems Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:59:23 +0200 (CEST) > Soren Schmidt wrote: > > > For current you need to update to the latest I've just yesterday fixed > > the DMA problem that occoured on the SiI3112, and the fix might help > > on other problems as well. And please loose vinum out of the mix here, > > it is not helping to find evt problems. > > If you are talking about the changes upto ata-lowlevel.c 1.22: no, > doesn't work (I did a headless test after I've seen the changes in the > morning, tomorrow I will do a verbose boot with a monitor attached and > write down all the panic-data again). Hmm, I've not heard of anybody else having trouble with the ich5 on -current, and you did test without vinum involved ? -Søren