From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Tue May 22 08:17:28 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D4EEEC6FA for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 08:17:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@nuxi.nl) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0F8E6903B for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 08:17:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@nuxi.nl) Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id n10-v6so30929537wmc.1 for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 01:17:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nuxi-nl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SePwEy7VLFQAIXgfeQq7WFOnv+V5H3h1A9Xlbxh076k=; b=Z6buLvgTw4MLWoQgo7Ae7gUHgWOIw65aRvqmHEotyip0prXkCHB7WoOeAF8kJtRoo/ 61JZzdbgzKYjryTtSVsjH2vnasWuImcp0+7r/qUwiM0EKu9govBydZkmG1T4HUmedJSX NcPwa4XICfyHPXZ/plQii/7qr9s8B37fDrGRiq4xwh8M9xnIAwvlKsLrXKBXosiXXJaP CtA87ratRvH+bA3QgGuMODFOsf0m6PlkvU4GecOFTViVVC9UGBMM41rpUrKSPQWoa/Ym tgdufjxM7tnKpDbeEXJk9VXprd7+uNeAN90Z1P9ai9N/2raL/2/qoO9eABNJbPW86NsY gI+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SePwEy7VLFQAIXgfeQq7WFOnv+V5H3h1A9Xlbxh076k=; b=ZM9aayfDN9HphaiUJL5HJm26QO2evAOFwad4o7NWc9++tEjkmgW3oqtCgK+HS21gkr F8r488tneyEM73P9lzpWwhOsiWO4bgZmQsMBdosTR4nPVX0CWdkiktyq9jFmBadA/eIA 9NKmwjChcEBVM4j3SGECS7wfQ1lpeHG24U22zeS8iabTjOy0DxAEg26i6cFwUZ592os8 bpU4Vt4lh9p6oEmdLpgAB5cHKWKyU13vURSPoTKHn8m626T7oxrWsYHQTTLerXG1umq/ Cb/f16ldeQjlRY37MV9ZeOPYeLvnspGDNaGzZe9p8TBXMJ6OFjt/rqie155EXFR5B7fy 4vMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwdDcQHFc/5QYCeStteWGWu+W4tVKlOAgvtKsE95EC4SP8ybmxF7 CzYSaim1tftgSy020X5JvnyCNjppn6Yv8XmNSOYnDQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqoRQU41dS8XqR00fiQ83j6nQ9OcVzNzCGhPzFOmk5dxf5jJ8LfIf89rhmZpZDjBQtPd0s3BpB5FnODEqt1GpM= X-Received: by 2002:a50:a722:: with SMTP id h31-v6mr920350edc.288.1526977046115; Tue, 22 May 2018 01:17:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.148.173 with HTTP; Tue, 22 May 2018 01:16:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180521134306.GT6887@kib.kiev.ua> References: <20180521134306.GT6887@kib.kiev.ua> From: Ed Schouten Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 10:16:55 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: printf("%m") doesn't generate a warning -- shouldn't it? To: Konstantin Belousov Cc: Dimitry Andric , FreeBSD Hackers , Thomas Munro Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 08:17:28 -0000 2018-05-21 15:43 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Belousov : > Why not add %m instead ? It is very easy and several people did it in > round-about ways. Added advantage of that approach is that it allows the syslog() function to be simplified significantly. No need to expand the %m there, which ends up being quite messy. -- Ed Schouten Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands