From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Oct 18 16:57:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA09824 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 18 Oct 1997 16:57:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from undertow.csh.rit.edu (root@undertow.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.214]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA09818 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 1997 16:57:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from atomik@undertow.csh.rit.edu) Received: from localhost (atomik@localhost) by undertow.csh.rit.edu (8.8.7/8.8.6) with SMTP id TAA16547 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 1997 19:48:13 -0400 Date: Sat, 18 Oct 1997 19:48:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Jesse To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: "Can Windows 95 co-exist with FreeBSD?" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On your FAQ (under ``Can Windows 95 co-exist with FreeBSD?") it said : Install Windows 95 first, after that FreeBSD. FreeBSD's boot manager will then manage to boot Win95 and FreeBSD. If you install Windows 95 second, it will boorishly overwrite your boot manager without even asking. If that happens, see the next section. Does this mean I can have windows and freeBSD on my computer without having to partition? thanks, Jesse