Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Dec 2022 16:39:09 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        python@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 268283] databases/py-sqlite3: switch away from distutils
Message-ID:  <bug-268283-21822-IWlzmjRa3y@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-268283-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-268283-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268283

--- Comment #8 from Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@FreeBSD.org> ---
> The feedback in previous comments was not approval to commit

Oh, my bad then. Bugzilla's, to be precise.

> Python 3.12 has not even reached release candidate yet

This is not relevant to adding it to the tree, the same way how previous
prereleases were added (and helped a lot to prepare the tree for the new py=
thon
version).

> setup.py is deprecated along with distutils getting removed, so continuin=
g to use the former is not acceptable, even if it does not error out.

This is nonsence, as "continuing to use" setup.py's for these ports is the =
only
thing which keeps them working. As long as setup.py's are in place, these
should be maintained and kept functioning, that's what I do. There's no
alternative to them.

Please provide a valid reason for it to be rolled back, such as it breaks
something or it blocks someone's work. For now it looks like you're trying =
to
block both my and Wen's, who did similar python3.12 port in parallel.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-268283-21822-IWlzmjRa3y>