From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 16 8:51:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from info.iet.unipi.it (info.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12FD37B422; Wed, 16 May 2001 08:51:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@info.iet.unipi.it) Received: (from luigi@localhost) by info.iet.unipi.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA48567; Wed, 16 May 2001 17:48:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from luigi) From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <200105161548.RAA48567@info.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: Bandwidth Limiting per IP In-Reply-To: from "Riley J. McIntire" at "May 16, 2001 08:23:08 am" To: "Riley J. McIntire" Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 17:48:12 +0200 (CEST) Cc: "Patrick O'Reilly" , ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG, Holtor , questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Luigi, > > It looks like you have a typo here. it looks you have forgotten the smiley :) in your msg. If not, then you have a bad font, because O != 0 cheers luigi > > then everything works pretty fast -- the ruleset is short, and > > the pipe processing overhead is O(log n) where n is the number of > > _active_ pipes. > > 0(log n) = 0 is pretty low overhead. > > n(log n) would seem more appropriate if I had to guess. > > Riley > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message