From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Apr 16 09:19:22 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA22091 for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 09:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA22085 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 09:19:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.7.5/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA04837; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 10:19:05 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199604161619.KAA04837@rover.village.org> To: Bill Fenner Subject: Re: bin/1145: tftpd should support -s Cc: Tom Samplonius , bugs@freefall.freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 16 Apr 1996 08:57:33 PDT Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 10:19:04 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk : So that you can replace your old tftp server with a FreeBSD box without : changing the "/my.boot.file" pathname that is in the NVRAM of 50 X-terminals. Yes. I replaced a SunOS machine that had ran 'tftpd -s /tftpboot' and I don't want to have to dink with all the NVRAM settings, some of which I have no docs for.... It is worse than that on some of the machines. They always request the IP address as a hex number, and don't prefix it with anything. And all the fonts are retrieved by tftp because there is no NFS traffic on my network, and can be no NFS traffic due to security policy. I've received some feedback from various people, and wish to modify my patches to reflect their comments. Is there anything special I need to do, or should I just do another send-pr? Warner