From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 20 14:42:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B52A106566C; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from mail.zoral.com.ua (mx0.zoral.com.ua [91.193.166.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC158FC0A; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q2KEgaPR094160; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:42:36 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2KEgaBY036122; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:42:36 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2KEgaWF036121; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:42:36 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:42:36 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Bruce Cran Message-ID: <20120320144236.GK2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20120319213508.GA1692@azathoth.lan> <20120320091935.GF1692@azathoth.lan> <20120320102008.GH2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iSeZnk6FyAS3EJ1y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:42:46 -0000 --iSeZnk6FyAS3EJ1y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:26:42PM +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: >=20 > On 20 Mar 2012, at 10:20, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >=20 > > i386-32 and amd64-64 is weird and confusing. > >=20 > > IMO, you should go either with x86-{32,64} names, or with i386/amd64, > > not with a mix. >=20 > Would we ever want to support something like x32 from Linux (which might = be amd64-32)? > http://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/2011/ocw/sessions/531 >=20 Yes, we do want to support this. In which form, and when, I have no good answer. We can propose some name for the architecture when the work starts. --iSeZnk6FyAS3EJ1y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9ol1wACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4hvrQCfS+tgvukMqRQOTsQvJZyDETjf 140AoO82qV2lqnNHc2jbZerCdmk2FYvN =rnuy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iSeZnk6FyAS3EJ1y--