Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:33:02 +0300 From: Alexander Yerenkow <yerenkow@gmail.com> To: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Fwd: GSOC: Qt front-ends Message-ID: <CAPJF9w=SGnKcHUN%2ByAiLWaUwmHdZuba%2BMFTv2D59CSchcvhhKg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8af7c4b114d6f1a44cf157a64fee3a7f@mail.0x20.net> References: <CA%2BnOTRiuJrVB_FSX2U18yd4ETD6mD004Mb%2BAh0Q-evofsqirnw@mail.gmail.com> <60A4F968-60A4-4C71-AD53-BA1BC6CBAB5F@longcount.org> <CA%2BnOTRjU8tBc5KwebxCzE%2B5XGUqSqpzn=O=UFuqT0LUB3M28mQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BnOTRgYm88Lwz=Z_=iVW8hDdKCkxMjUf=y9xHkOi0ExHjMfRw@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83_GJxB0UZGp6KR8nDZcnO3hdRJ6Jw8RFG5J6Z2BLdvYRg@mail.gmail.com> <8af7c4b114d6f1a44cf157a64fee3a7f@mail.0x20.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
During some tests with cut down kernels one can easily make unbuildable kernel, for example include option A, while omit hiddenly required B. If there could be framework at least with deps tracking/checking, what could be good for begin. Both for configuring, and code clean up. If this will come up in GUI - that would be awesome. -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPJF9w=SGnKcHUN%2ByAiLWaUwmHdZuba%2BMFTv2D59CSchcvhhKg>