From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 11:45:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B0FF837 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-33.italiaonline.it (smtp-33.italiaonline.it [212.48.25.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC2BDAB for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.41.175.200]) by smtp-33.iol.local with bizsmtp id Fnkg1p00u4KncHT0ZnkgRY; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:44:41 +0100 x-libjamoibt: 1601 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=G/aSErU5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=Jt+UxvNov/ecafJZOm2SWg==:117 a=Jt+UxvNov/ecafJZOm2SWg==:17 a=_M8H_RHeOCMA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=47006F4cU5eU9Z4KHuoA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=YigEftXgijIA:10 a=zEj1TvEN1fMA:10 a=X5K6bVNKuHoA:10 Received: from guardian.ventu (bane.ventu [10.1.2.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.ventu (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sAFBiV2L065217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:44:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host bane.ventu [10.1.2.15] claimed to be guardian.ventu Message-ID: <54673CA1.5020008@netfence.it> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:44:33 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best overall upgrade from 8.x? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 on 10.1.2.13 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:45:52 -0000 On 11/15/14 05:48, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I'd wait a month or so and, if no problems that might impact you pop up, > I'd go with 10.1 Uh... is direct upgrade (using sources) possible from 8.4 to 10.1? No need to step through 9.x? bye & Thanks av.