From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 22:45:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FB61065674; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from mail.netmusician.org (dorian.netmusician.org [66.244.95.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1706E8FC17; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16279B8C8; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 17:45:53 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netmusician.org Received: from mail.netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dorian.netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id bnXRk2-W0+Po; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 17:45:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from Shakti.local (c-71-201-100-167.hsd1.in.comcast.net [71.201.100.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 715AEB8C2; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 17:45:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4CFD679C.7020804@netmusician.org> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:45:48 -0500 From: Joe Auty User-Agent: Postbox 2.0.2 (Macintosh/20101025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rick Macklem References: <462624062.1260806.1291675347837.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <462624062.1260806.1291675347837.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, =?UTF-8?B?RWR3YXJkIFRvbWFzeiBOYXBpZXJhxYJh?= Subject: Re: Migrating from NFSv3 to v4 - NFSv4 ACL/permission confusion X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:45:54 -0000 Rick Macklem wrote: >> So, if I want to just ignore the NFSv4 ACLs on account of not needing >> anything beyond the POSIX ACLs, I'm free to do so without >> consequence... Correct? >> > > Well, NFSv4 won't be able to manipulate POSIX ACLs (really POSIX.1e draft > which was never ratified and, as such, isn't a POSIX standard as I understand > it). If you meant "beyond chmod" then I think you will be ok, but I haven't > used ZFS, so?? > Well, chmods and POSIX.1e ACLs work fine in NFSv3 with the same ZFS server and everything else being the same on the FreeBSD site, so I don't think that ZFS is the problem here unless ZFS has some sort of NFSv4 host bug. -- Joe Auty, NetMusician NetMusician helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful, professional, custom designed, career-essential websites that are easy to maintain and to integrate with popular social networks. www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org