Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 May 2005 08:09:23 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Konrad Heuer <kheuer2@gwdg.de>
To:        Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: Upgrading from Samba 2 to Samba 3
Message-ID:  <20050518075641.F99328@gwdu60.gwdg.de>
In-Reply-To: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNOEHGFBAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
References:  <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNOEHGFBAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Tue, 17 May 2005, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:

> It's great if you like your server applications to be twice as
> complicated
> as before.  Seriously, though, you can turn off all the fru-fru and
> set it up pretty much equivalent to a samba 2 server.  The fru-fru is
> needed if you have a lot of XP stuff and you want to interoperate with a
> Microsoft AD.
>
> Ted
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Roger Merritt
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 7:40 PM
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Upgrading from Samba 2 to Samba 3
> >
> >
> > I've just become aware that samba.org is no longer supporting Samba 2
> > (which has served me well for so long) and I should upgrade to
> > Samba 3,
> > which is now the stable version. I don't find any warnings about it in
> > /usr/ports/UPDATING. Does anyone have any gotchas I should be aware of?
> >

I recently heard a lecture about the evolution of Samba 4. Seems to me you
can't understand it unless your are Microsoft certified systems engineer
with lots of special active directory knowledge ... ;-)

Best regards

Konrad Heuer
GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, kheuer2@gwdg.de



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050518075641.F99328>