From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 8 08:56:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A05B1065673 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anders@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fupp.net (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79D98FC14 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20]) by fupp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B0E47114 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:36:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fupp.net ([80.91.36.20]) by localhost (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uE60sxk492mZ for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:36:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by fupp.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E670747113; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:36:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:36:49 +0200 From: Anders Nordby To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100608083649.GA77452@fupp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Key: http://anders.fix.no/pgp/ X-PGP-Key-FingerPrint: 1E0F C53C D8DF 6A8F EAAD 19C5 D12A BC9F 0083 5956 Subject: Odd network issues on ZFS based NFS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 08:56:15 -0000 Hi! I have a file server running 8.1-PRERELEASE amd64, where I share some filesystems using NFS and Samba. After running for a day or two, the server starts to get around 25% packet loss, browsing directories across NFS gets really slow etc. Rebooting solves it until it happens again. Has anyone experienced anything similar? I had this issue in FreeBSD 7 as well, upgrading did not help. PS: I used mountd and /etc/exports to share the filesystems. I also regularly run zpool status from monitoring systems. I also replaced the server physically, changed switch ports, cables etc. So it does not seem to be a problem with hardware. Bye, -- Anders.