From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 28 20:42:46 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E3D16A41F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:42:46 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net)
Received: from smtp2.suscom.net (smtp2.suscom.net [64.78.83.231])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E4743D48
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:42:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net)
Received: from localhost (smtp2.suscom.net [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp2.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76581CDF3D
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:31:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp2.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP
	id 28031-03 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:31:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148])
	by smtp2.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 29C041CDF3A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:31:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8SKgVog030770
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:42:32 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net)
Received: from localhost (root@localhost)
	by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id j8SKgV04030767
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:42:31 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:42:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Gerard Seibert <gerard@seibercom.net>
To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20050928163600.C30755@seibercom.net>
Organization: Seibercom
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at suscom.net
Subject: Shadowed Files
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Gerard Seibert <gerard@seibercom.net>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:42:46 -0000

When running 'portsclean', this message is displayed:

** /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3 is shadowed by /lib/libcrypto.so.3
          /lib/libcrypto.so.3     <- ?
          /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3   <- openssl-0.9.8
   --> This may be an undesirable situation
Leave /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (specify -i to ask on this)

** /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3 is shadowed by /usr/lib/libssl.so.3
          /usr/lib/libssl.so.3    <- ?
          /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3      <- openssl-0.9.8
   --> This may be an undesirable situation
Leave /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (specify -i to ask on this)

Would it be safe to delete the redundant library? I assume that I should 
remove the /usr/lib/ version and not the /usr/local/lib version.

-- 
Gerard
gerard@seibercom.net