From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Wed Sep 21 20:49:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9331EBE41FB; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:49:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8422CFCA; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:49:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 821BC12B2; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:49:50 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Tijl Coosemans Cc: John Marino , marino@freebsd.org, Mathieu Arnold , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r422505 - head/archivers/snappy-java Message-ID: <20160921204950.GA83030@FreeBSD.org> References: <201609201519.u8KFJrTF059560@repo.freebsd.org> <3bbaf8af-e9d0-9fce-b103-2055bdce8e18@marino.st> <1db2352b-f6b6-ba58-d18d-7d1eac5c4c0f@FreeBSD.org> <202c3516-4c9e-971f-eddc-e3eb904f1ff7@marino.st> <92a0385e-13ac-0a43-4761-103ffa2e9961@FreeBSD.org> <9f4ce30a-70a4-f668-50e0-a35be78b5032@marino.st> <1b891572-9be2-f658-2942-42f5f6168c3d@FreeBSD.org> <3a8164b8-e15d-b955-05fc-3d817d1168d7@marino.st> <20160921211117.54166e17@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160921211117.54166e17@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:49:50 -0000 On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 09:11:17PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > ... > I would say using Fedora's cache is leeching and not very nice. On the > other hand I wouldn't have marked the ports broken. Use of our distcache > for 14 days should be acceptable. After that you can mark it broken. I was actually wondering why use any distcache instead of Google's Cloud URL instead? I did not find them mention that there is an expiration date for Google Code project archives, so it's probably OK to assume we have a nice read-only storage of those distfiles for the time being, no? ./danfe