From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov  3 11:20:01 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A826E186
 for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Nov 2012 11:20:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6155A8FC0C
 for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Nov 2012 11:20:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA3BK1gq057970
 for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:20:01 GMT
 (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA3BK12n057969;
 Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:20:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Resent-Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:20:01 GMT
Resent-Message-Id: <201211031120.qA3BK12n057969@freefall.freebsd.org>
Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org,
 Aldis Berjoza <graudeejs@yandex.ru>
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD024167
 for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  3 Nov 2012 11:17:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from red.freebsd.org (red.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::22])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57138FC08
 for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  3 Nov 2012 11:17:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from red.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by red.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA3BHN0Y043511
 for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:17:23 GMT
 (envelope-from nobody@red.freebsd.org)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
 by red.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA3BHNJH043510;
 Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:17:23 GMT (envelope-from nobody)
Message-Id: <201211031117.qA3BHNJH043510@red.freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:17:23 GMT
From: Aldis Berjoza <graudeejs@yandex.ru>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.1
Subject: misc/173329: amd64 iso images of FreeBDS 9.0 and 9.1 are in wrong
 directory
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 11:20:01 -0000


>Number:         173329
>Category:       misc
>Synopsis:       amd64 iso images of FreeBDS 9.0 and 9.1 are in wrong directory
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Nov 03 11:20:00 UTC 2012
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Aldis Berjoza
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/ doesn't contain 9.0 and 9.1

Instead 9.0 and 9.1 are in ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/ (note the extra amd64)

Same applies to release txz archives. They are in ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ and not in ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ as they should be.


I just checked other arch, and this but replies as well.
So is this a bug or intentional change? If it was intentioned change, then I don't see the logic for this move.

P.S.
This problem was around since release of 9.0
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: