Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:17:23 GMT From: Aldis Berjoza <graudeejs@yandex.ru> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: misc/173329: amd64 iso images of FreeBDS 9.0 and 9.1 are in wrong directory Message-ID: <201211031117.qA3BHNJH043510@red.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201211031120.qA3BK12n057969@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 173329 >Category: misc >Synopsis: amd64 iso images of FreeBDS 9.0 and 9.1 are in wrong directory >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Nov 03 11:20:00 UTC 2012 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Aldis Berjoza >Release: >Organization: >Environment: >Description: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/ doesn't contain 9.0 and 9.1 Instead 9.0 and 9.1 are in ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/ (note the extra amd64) Same applies to release txz archives. They are in ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ and not in ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ as they should be. I just checked other arch, and this but replies as well. So is this a bug or intentional change? If it was intentioned change, then I don't see the logic for this move. P.S. This problem was around since release of 9.0 >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201211031117.qA3BHNJH043510>