From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 18:24:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A4116A4CE; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:24:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from CPE000103d44c07-CM000f9f7ae88c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (CPE000103d44c07-CM000f9f7ae88c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.193.222.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE0643D46; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:24:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from cpe000103d44c07-cm000f9f7ae88c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])with ESMTP id C64E0295437; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:24:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from 207.219.213.163 (proxying for unknown) (SquirrelMail authenticated user mikej); by cpe000103d44c07-cm000f9f7ae88c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:24:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <65174.207.219.213.163.1102357456.squirrel@207.219.213.163> In-Reply-To: <41B40C97.7000102@yahoo.com> References: <41B40C97.7000102@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:24:16 -0500 (EST) From: "Mike Jakubik" To: "Rob" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-wettoast-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-wettoast-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: mikej@rogers.com cc: freebsd-current cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: names of supfiles in /usr/share/examples/cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:24:24 -0000 Rob said: > > Hi, > > For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's: > > stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable > standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current > > I find this naming rather confusing. Why "stable" refers to STABLE, but > "standard" refers to CURRENT ? > > This causes unnecessary confusion. Why not the following name convention: > > release-supfile : for FreeBSD-RELEASE > stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-STABLE > current-supfile : for FreeBSD-CURRENT > > as default supplied files in /usr/share/examples/cvsup ? I agree with you. It has been weird like this ever since 5.x. In the 4.x days they were named with some common sense.