From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 21 14:40:02 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EA7106566B
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:40:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C408FC0C
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:40:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8LEe2V2035652
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:40:02 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8LEe28B035651;
	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:40:02 GMT
Resent-Message-Id: <201209211440.q8LEe28B035651@freefall.freebsd.org>
Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Hans <hm@hm.net.br>
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9BE106564A
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>;
	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:30:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from red.freebsd.org (red.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::22])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B39D8FC12
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>;
	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:30:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from red.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by red.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8LEU4gj093891
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:30:04 GMT
	(envelope-from nobody@red.freebsd.org)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
	by red.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8LEU4Ll093890;
	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:30:04 GMT (envelope-from nobody)
Message-Id: <201209211430.q8LEU4Ll093890@red.freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:30:04 GMT
From: Hans <hm@hm.net.br>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.1
Cc: 
Subject: ports/171850: Misleading pkg install option in fusefs-kmod
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:40:02 -0000


>Number:         171850
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       Misleading pkg install option in fusefs-kmod
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Sep 21 14:40:02 UTC 2012
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Hans
>Release:        9-Stable
>Organization:
HM-Net TI Ltda
>Environment:
FreeBSD pop1.hm.net.br 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #7 r238716M: Wed Sep 19 06:07:26 BRT 2012     hmm@pop1.hm.net.br:/usr/obj/dados/src/sys/WIPMINI  i386

>Description:

Installing or upgrading fusefs-kmod shows the following option which is enabled by default:

[X]   Automatic global config file setup  

which then adds if not exists fusefs_enable="YES" to rc.conf

that is not a good choice

the option asks for setup, what is one thing

enabling is a totally other thing

I suggest that this behavior get changed, for example making the right question as

[ ] Enabling Fusefs at boot time?

and let it disabled by default


>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: