From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Mar 6 22: 2:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from grafin.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (grafin.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp [133.9.152.154]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049C537B719 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 22:02:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fujimori@grafin.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp) Received: from grafin.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (fujimori@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grafin.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with ESMTP id PAA04748 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 15:02:31 +0900 Message-Id: <200103070602.PAA04748@grafin.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp> To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Sym driver, instable(?) Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 15:02:31 +0000 From: Yoriaki FUJIMORI Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Folks, I have been testing several scsi (u2w) cards on up1100. Cards are tekram 390F/u2b, noname 4306LVD, iti3400 (uw) etc. They are all driven by a sym driver. In the meantime, often I see a kernel warning: Warning: received processor correctable error. This occurs when I run compilers. At first, I igonored this, but later I noticed this may lead to scsi bus reset ... blahblah ... or even a system freeze, if I invoke heavy disk access, like % make clean in /usr/ports. I checked the overheat problem of scsi chips, but it was not the case. These cards work just fine on pc164lx- and alphapc164-based boxes. So, I guess sym driver may have some timing problem or others on PC100-based up1100. # I have not yet tested Adaptec. Best wishes, Yoriaki Fujimori To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message