From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 28 13:53:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6E4106566C; Thu, 28 May 2009 13:53:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C6D8FC1D; Thu, 28 May 2009 13:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9758946B09; Thu, 28 May 2009 09:53:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.hudson-trading.com (unknown [209.249.190.8]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6EE748A028; Thu, 28 May 2009 09:53:04 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Timothy Mukaibo Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:00:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <49159824-57EB-4628-9F1C-CE9243465D02@mukaibo.com> <200905271725.44235.jhb@freebsd.org> <849F0899-7AD9-4D7A-B849-D7FB36CE73AE@mukaibo.com> In-Reply-To: <849F0899-7AD9-4D7A-B849-D7FB36CE73AE@mukaibo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905280800.24867.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Thu, 28 May 2009 09:53:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: ACPI Panic on Current, AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:53:06 -0000 On Thursday 28 May 2009 2:59:16 am Timothy Mukaibo wrote: > Hello guys, > > I'm not sure if I made this clear, but the board boots with 7.2- > Stable. Have there been lots of ACPI changes between 7.2 and 8.0 that > might have caused this regression? No, and the ACPI pci_link code has in fact not changed since 7.0 aside from a few minor fixes for suspend/resume that do not affect boot (and those were merged into 7.1). I do wonder if perhaps there have been any changes in the ACPI-CA code. Hmm, ACPI-CA is identical in the two versions. All of the resource code is identical as well. -- John Baldwin