From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 14:05:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DDC37B401 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:05:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from loop.cnt.org (mailbox.cnt.org [68.20.235.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EF143FCB for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:05:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul@mailbox.cnt.org) Received: from loop.cnt.org (localhost.cnt.org [127.0.0.1]) by loop.cnt.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h68L5CvC024764; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:05:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from paul@mailbox.cnt.org) X-Authentication-Warning: loop.cnt.org: Host localhost.cnt.org [127.0.0.1] claimed to be loop.cnt.org Received: (from paul@localhost) by loop.cnt.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h68L5CFZ024763; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:05:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from paul) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:05:12 -0500 From: Paul Smith To: Farid Hajji Message-ID: <20030708210511.GF66624@cnt.org> References: <20030708200104.GA66624@cnt.org> <3F0B2AAE.5080708@mac.com> <200307082250.03189.me@farid-hajji.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200307082250.03189.me@farid-hajji.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hardening production servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 21:05:15 -0000 Farid Hajji wrote on 08/Jul/03 at 3:50 PM: > > If you do a "make package" for each port that you install, you can copy of > > using network filesharing (NFS, Samba, etc) to distribute the > > /usr/ports/packages directory. Create that directory if it doesn't exist, > > and "make package" will save the .tgz there rather than under each > > individual port directory. Is there a way to take advantage of the portupgrade suite when it comes to building packages? I.e., is there a "make package" equivalent in portupgrade? I would imagine portupgrade would make packages of any dependicies as well, no? -- Paul Smith Webmaster/Systems Administrator Center for Neighborhood Technology Chicago, Illinois USA