From owner-freebsd-isp  Thu Apr 10 10:10:34 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA18131
          for isp-outgoing; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 10:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from main.netcorps.com (main.netcorps.com [205.149.1.66])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA18126
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 10:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by main.netcorps.com (8.7.1/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA26278 for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 10:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199704101707.KAA26278@main.netcorps.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: main.netcorps.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Sprint or MCI ??
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 10:07:54 -0700
From: Chris Bura <chris@main.Netcorps.com>
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Hi,

We're trying to decide between Sprint or MCI for our T1 service.
They both have the good sales pitches.  

	Sprint says they're all IP and MCI mixes frame with IP.
	MCI says they have 40% of the internet traffic.

As far as marketing goes, I think MCI is more dominant.

This is a huge binding decision so we'd really like to do it right.

Anybody have any non-biased information for us?

Thanks

Chris