From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 15 17:25:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA06080 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 17:25:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA05935 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 17:24:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA05604; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 17:24:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 17:24:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Chris Martino cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Modem Problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Chris Martino wrote: > Okay...well...befire I was user kernel ppp, since then I've had many > freebsd users at work tell me that kernel pp basically isn't that good > yet. So maybe it has something to do with that. So, I will try user ppp > and see how it goes. Each has their strengths. Kernel ppp is great for unattended operation. User mode ppp is great for interactive use / debugging. Kernel ppp is supposed to be a little more effcient, although no one has done any benchmarks recently. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message