Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 09:39:31 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: rob spellberg <emailrob@emailrob.com> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which make in freebsd? Message-ID: <xzpznfdeth8.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <3FA5EC15.2C7F1656@emailrob.com> (rob spellberg's message of "Sun, 02 Nov 2003 23:48:05 -0600") References: <20031102010136.44997855.beyert@cs.ucr.edu> <xzpfzh6apma.fsf@dwp.des.no> <3FA5EC15.2C7F1656@emailrob.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
rob spellberg <emailrob@emailrob.com> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > gmake is inferior in most ways that matter. > why? Most noticeably, the lack of .for / .endfor. OTOH, the way loops are implemented in pmake really sucks... DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpznfdeth8.fsf>