Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 22:37:48 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Problems with USE_AUTOMAKE_VER variable Message-ID: <20040404063748.GA31725@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040403222749.42837e34@gorf.lovett.com> References: <20040404023418.GA37816@crodrigues.org> <20040404025156.GA29009@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040404030247.GA38436@crodrigues.org> <20040404033602.GA29488@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040403222749.42837e34@gorf.lovett.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 10:27:49PM -0800, Ade Lovett wrote: > On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 19:36:02 -0800 > Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: >=20 > > The USE_AUTOCONF_VER and related knobs appear to not yet be functional > > (in all cases?). Revert the changes made in r1.33 of the makefile and > > stick to the WANT_ version for now. >=20 > I'm pretty sure I'd reverted all the WANT->USE changes, which were the > cause of the problems (as opposed to the USE->USE_*_VER). No, there are still ports broken: apr, apr-thread and php-gtk. > I'm currently stuck in a holding pattern, first awaiting the effective > null-commit of bsd.autotools.mk, followed by a second major update to > bsd.autotools.mk itself. The PR has been assigned to portmgr for quite > some time, yet little appears to be happening on this front. >=20 > Given the power of (at least) the i386 cluster to do a 4-exp build, why > is it taking so long to get this in? Because the i386 cluster has been running hot with other changes. and so have I. I don't know why you're raising this again since I've already told you I'll be testing it this week. Ade, the bottom line here is that you made a mistake and broke some ports, some of which I cleaned up myself when I had other things I should have been doing, and 3 of which are still broken. Whether or not a different patch has been tested on the bento cluster is irrelevant to the matter at hand. Kris --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAb608Wry0BWjoQKURArgbAKCxYIM6u4UuHHEcvu4pXfq0/dbTRACgoekg F6tBK4yTHM6Ct+LyGj04oYs= =qhD3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040404063748.GA31725>