From owner-freebsd-security Sun Apr 9 21:19:35 1995 Return-Path: security-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA00157 for security-outgoing; Sun, 9 Apr 1995 21:19:35 -0700 Received: from mail.barrnet.net (mail.BARRNET.NET [131.119.246.7]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA00151 for ; Sun, 9 Apr 1995 21:19:33 -0700 Received: from clinet.fi (clinet.fi [193.64.6.1]) by mail.barrnet.net (8.6.10/MAIL-RELAY-LEN) with ESMTP id VAA16126 for ; Sun, 9 Apr 1995 21:16:58 -0700 Received: from zetor.clinet.fi (root@zetor.clinet.fi [193.64.6.8]) by clinet.fi (8.6.10/8.6.4) with ESMTP id HAA00352; Mon, 10 Apr 1995 07:18:09 +0300 From: Heikki Suonsivu Received: (hsu@localhost) by zetor.clinet.fi (8.6.10/8.6.4) id JAA00260; Mon, 10 Apr 1995 09:19:28 +0300 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 1995 09:19:28 +0300 Message-Id: <199504100619.JAA00260@zetor.clinet.fi> To: John Capo Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: satan "heavy" mode attacks In-Reply-To: <199504082241.SAA00738@irbs.com> References: <199504081658.MAA29650@ns1.win.net> <199504082241.SAA00738@irbs.com> Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Otaniemi, Finland Sender: security-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk John Capo writes: > I have run the "heavy" Satan against four -current systems and > three 1.1.5.1 systems and they survived just fine. YMMV :-) We got complaints about NFS mounts leaking to unpriviledged programs when running satan against 1.1.5.1. 2.* systems seem to be safe. -- Heikki Suonsivu, T{ysikuu 10 C 83/02210 Espoo/FINLAND, hsu@cs.hut.fi home +358-0-8031121 work -4513377 fax -4555276 riippu SN