From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 8 14:36:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA10435 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 14:36:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from rodan.rs.itd.umich.edu (0@rodan.rs.itd.umich.edu [141.211.83.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA10414 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 14:36:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from delturge@umich.edu) Received: from delturge (pm352-00.dialip.mich.net [207.75.184.100]) by rodan.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.8.5/2.4) with SMTP id RAA12358 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 17:36:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 17:36:32 -0500 Message-ID: <01BD1C5B.F5EB92A0.delturge@umich.edu> From: "Anthony E. Rutledge" Reply-To: "delturge@umich.edu" To: "'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: Is FreeBSD 2.2.5 the most reilable and stable FreeBSD release out there? Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 17:34:14 -0500 Organization: Rutledge Services X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk There are so many different versions of FreeBSD. Which one is the best to use? I want to try to install it. FreeBSD 2.2.2 was around for a while. Was it replaced by FreeBSD 2.2.5? If so, please let me know. Thanks in advance Anthony E. Rutledge P.S. I think the fact that FreeBSD is free is very cool.