Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Nov 2000 09:17:24 -0800
From:      "Timothy L. Robertson" <timothyr@timothyr.com>
To:        "Christoph Sold" <so@server.i-clue.de>, <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: Flaky IP Connection
Message-ID:  <NEBBKDBFKKIDPAPJPFOPIEPBCGAA.timothyr@timothyr.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A0295F2.972BC9E3@i-clue.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Sold [mailto:so@server.i-clue.de]
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 2:40 AM
> To: Timothy L. Robertson
> Subject: Re: Flaky IP Connection
>
> IIRC, a recent article in german magazine c't discussed this problem:
> Since PPPoE needs room for PPP headers in each ether packet, you loose
> 12 bytes per packet. Your remote site announces this correctly, causing
> packet fragmentation.
>
> maybe I'm wrong, so please anybody speak up with more experience in
> networking?
>
> HTH
> -Christoph Sold
>
>

This makes sense.  The MTU reported by tcpdump seems to always be 12 bytes
less
than the MTU I set tun0 to.  What do I do about it, though, to keep my
connection flowing?  The TCP/IP stack is supposed to probe routers by
setting
the don't fragment bit and watching for icmp packets and set the MTU in
routing
tables accordingly, but I get the feeling something is not working right
here.
Should I ask this question of freebsd-bugs?

- -Tim

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>;

iQA/AwUBOgLy5xJDu7xQsK72EQLJBwCg8aZgk+1iNGOiLvAu4F+68hrzocQAnjZk
89B1ApWDFhWWBzX606yb7lyr
=CD4/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NEBBKDBFKKIDPAPJPFOPIEPBCGAA.timothyr>