Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:34:56 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>, "Suietov, Fiodor F" <fiodor.f.suietov@intel.com>, Stephen Hurd <shurd@sasktel.net>, Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com>, "Podrezov, Valery A" <valery.a.podrezov@intel.com> Subject: Re: HP LH3000r hangs on boot with ACPI enabled Message-ID: <200702221434.59679.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <B28E9812BAF6E2498B7EC5C427F293A401F472BA@orsmsx415.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <B28E9812BAF6E2498B7EC5C427F293A401F472BA@orsmsx415.amr.corp.intel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 22 February 2007 01:33 pm, Moore, Robert wrote: > Good. As always, we are available for assistance as needed. Here are upstream patches against 20070126: http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpica/upstream-20070126.diff Thanks! Jung-uk Kim > Thanks, > Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nate Lawson [mailto:nate@root.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 5:00 PM > > To: John Baldwin > > Cc: Moore, Robert; Stephen Hurd; freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org; Alexey > > Starikovskiy; Brown, Len; Suietov, Fiodor F; Podrezov, Valery A > > Subject: Re: HP LH3000r hangs on boot with ACPI enabled > > > > John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Wednesday 21 February 2007 16:47, Moore, Robert wrote: > > >> Nate, > > >> > > >> We have tried to keep ACPICA as OS-independent as possible. In > > >> the > > case > > > >> of spinlocks, you can easily implement the interfaces with > > >> whatever > > is > > > >> appropriate (or available) for your OS. > > >> > > >> We felt that we needed to split the mutex interfaces into > > >> mutex/spinlocks for those hosts that have these different > > >> types of synchronization mechanisms. > > >> > > >> Certainly, I would suggest that you keep up-to-date with the > > >> latest ACPICA as we continue to develop and debug the code. > > > > > > Since the ACPI interrupt is run in an ithread, you can probably > > > just ignore the IRQL stuff as garbage and use a regular mutex > > > Nate. > > Also, > > > > this bug report was from 6.2, so it was actually from an older > > version > > > > of ACPICA. Can't recall what is holding up the MFC of 20051021 > > > to > > 6.x. > > > Yes, I'm hoping we can do that. Jung-uk Kim is preparing a patch > > of 20070126 so hopefully we can test and integrate that. > > > > We didn't MFC 20051021 due to a memory leak on some systems (bad > > refcount). That was fixed a few revisions later, but I remember > > a few 2006 versions having other problems (hanging on boot) and > > then I ran > > out > > > of time to review/debug the patches. > > > > Hopefully 20070126 is good and we can commit it quickly, then MFC > > after > > > a month. > > > > -- > > Nate > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702221434.59679.jkim>