From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:26:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5909F16A4CF; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:26:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moof.catpipe.net (moof.catpipe.net [195.249.214.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07B843D48; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:26:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from regnauld@moof.catpipe.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B390B70601; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:26:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from moof.catpipe.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (moof.catpipe.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34388-06; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:26:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by moof.catpipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A05607061C; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:26:39 +0100 (CET) Resent-From: regnauld@moof.catpipe.net Resent-Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:26:39 +0100 Resent-Message-ID: <20050102152639.GA34461@moof.catpipe.net> Resent-To: grehan@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:55:05 +0100 From: Phil Regnauld To: Peter Grehan Message-ID: <20050102115505.GA28305@moof.catpipe.net> References: <41D4B6BD.3050705@freebsd.org> <20050101213630.GA3034@flow.eu.org> <20050101223317.GA6970@moof.catpipe.net> <41D75B55.2090502@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41D75B55.2090502@freebsd.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386 Organization: catpipe Systems ApS User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at catpipe.net cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPC miniinst.iso available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:26:43 -0000 Peter Grehan (grehan) writes: > > WRT partitions, do you think it would be useful to have them within a > slice ? I've been thinking about allowing GPT partitions within a > slice for a while, although it does complicate the loader a bit. I don't really know, I assumed that was the way it worked on PPC as well as i386. But considering we don't have the slice restrictions, it does make sense to use one partition / slice (as OS X sees it). How is it on Alpha ? If there's a precedent there, it might be the way to go.