From nobody Tue Dec 13 14:01:30 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NWgCY2Cr7z4jdpX for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:01:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NWgCX0N7Pz3lJR for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:01:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b="i+/VaStJ"; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rsimmons0@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::231 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rsimmons0@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id g14so3352572ljh.10 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 06:01:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=p4G6sbOOFasGwWDiZVvsq7SL31n84OPU3fPVwRFYzNQ=; b=i+/VaStJtyRlVHcR5ZtkCFK4QQNrIXAg4r/woiiG1bY5k6PjN43VRuaUn/exTH8BLX p1O/zafTj8EH9YFZQ27xPz7deYGNST3k/0+s2Yzo0cm5vZi3I2tg20WQm3s2njERvYYS M+FqXcTObusE8ieXKFe9fqfPFXaU6faM5GiavAanoco44ZFtmM5F5h0SVJcXmYSA0K/H v0T7yaKlQ88OqjmuSQtkwoXtvy7qANCiPH7JkM3M4LpB6xj3Vd4XqVN3OXUPod+7MZ9z dnLwzeL0EKujKGpyyvXYXblmQPAwn0Yy3433Yq7zoH9bYAvbziVyZ+oXsA6hYOP6X5mL nfBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=p4G6sbOOFasGwWDiZVvsq7SL31n84OPU3fPVwRFYzNQ=; b=Yviezh8uELSsi8Fi0GEhHBNFP1iaCbWB7iSbfDtetDI7pbG9yPD1wpMiQqQzUTMXAI 20mThK5A7Q1hAPMkyZCJNk3CYhSD1vdyeM3KVn7ex1vHTHj5Eg4EqltbsMx43oO3NHeD iaRbCnvcZdLLdSrxNDQ/qnpb0Gvcucuzd7Ul5TIuFBZbqv1V6xa1CJ/kMXsZQG6YcBls ZKJdXX16hFjwVczZ9Gf4XnoqLipn8GspxvK6ZHdKiVsdO6flWeXgfQHSdq5vQdGQ9R7C MpZJa7Wb2lHDrkz0xMeCKylx6XuIyeiVVJCMmMieMO9lNnvpVUem+R+th9IJITYtjCeV Wm+A== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pk29mrE+AV+HEErS7HvoipJNonQtc4sWz3knCVWY5/kDtj2EOXC Hgove/6t+LldKd8mmzhS+kyup74XMvi9eVDTpzE7Je1xYYJFXoJp X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7VDNpiu2erZ2thKzaRa+ZCcSdu+YRyn2mgywNpxnZBobQmqskUoP5cfk8dxTxMSHa0NSwg406tp4MxtW1zwMg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:160a:b0:277:6e27:6000 with SMTP id f10-20020a05651c160a00b002776e276000mr28329166ljq.104.1670940101878; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 06:01:41 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221213081604.Horde.YR0jWNbnSQE02jwSUyttml3@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20221213081604.Horde.YR0jWNbnSQE02jwSUyttml3@webmail.leidinger.net> From: Robert Simmons Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 09:01:30 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Procmail Version To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000036a6e805efb60f20" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.53 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.957]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.71)[-0.710]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.14)[0.135]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::231:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4NWgCX0N7Pz3lJR X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --00000000000036a6e805efb60f20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" That's great, thanks for the pointer. I read in the commit message the following: As this upstream is in active development and the original procmail on sourceforge is defunct, we may wish to consider merging or replacing mail/procmail with this port at some point. I have a few thoughts. This does not appear to be a fork. It looks like a new version hosted on Github. The author updated the copyright and I looked at older READMEs from pre-2001 and the author's email is the same as today, srb [@] cuci[.]nl. I have not sent an email to this email address, but the MX SMTP greeting is quite similar to the username of the entity who is checking in the new updates: "ESMTP Postfix (Cubic Circle/BuGless)". Is the reasoning behind calling this a fork and not a new version because the identity of the entity checking in updates on the Github repo cannot be confirmed? On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 2:16 AM Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Robert Simmons (from Mon, 12 Dec 2022 > 18:22:27 -0500): > > There is a new version of procmail. Is updating the FreeBSD port to the > new 3.24 a good idea? > > https://github.com/BuGlessRB/procmail/releases > > > Have a look at $PORTSDIR/mail/procmail-bgrb/ > > Bye, > Alexander. > > http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander@Leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF > http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild@FreeBSD.org : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF > --00000000000036a6e805efb60f20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That's great, thanks for the pointer.

I read in the commit message the following:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 As t= his upstream is in active development and the original procmail on
=C2= =A0 =C2=A0 sourceforge is defunct, we may wish to consider merging or repla= cing
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 mail/procmail with this port at some point.
=

I have a few thoughts. This does not appear to be a for= k. It looks like a new version hosted on Github. The author updated the cop= yright and I looked at older READMEs from pre-2001 and the author's ema= il is the same as today,=C2=A0srb [@] cuci[.]nl. I have not sent an email= =C2=A0to this email address, but the MX SMTP greeting is quite similar to t= he username of the entity who is checking in the new updates: "ESMTP P= ostfix (Cubic Circle/BuGless)".

Is the reason= ing behind calling this a fork and not a new version because the identity o= f the entity checking in updates on the Github repo cannot be confirmed?

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 2:16 AM Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> wrote:
=

Quoting Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@gmail.com> (from Mon, 12 Dec 2022 18:22:27 -05= 00):

There is a new version of procmail. Is updating the FreeBS= D port to the new 3.24 a good idea?
=C2=A0


Have a look at $PORTSDIR/mail/procmail-bgrb/

Bye,
Alexander.

http://www.Leid= inger.net = Alexander@Leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
http://www.FreeBSD.org= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 netchild@FreeBSD.org=C2=A0 : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
--00000000000036a6e805efb60f20--