From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 06:55:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FA89527 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 06:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA71CB33 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 06:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t136tQkd061568 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 06:55:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195238] [Hyper-v] Enhance VMBUS and improve storage performance Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 06:55:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: weh@microsoft.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 06:55:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195238 --- Comment #4 from Wei Hu --- (In reply to Xin LI from comment #3) No. Fang Jun has just updated the Bug 196185, -- "The hyperv_support.S will not be used this time, we will delete it." It turned out it is possible to add the feature without rebuilding the kernel. So we will not include the feature in the PORTS work. The code added in apic_vector.s is in align with Xen's implementation. Xen also has the similar code segment in the same files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.